oliviatamccue

about everything, anything or something

Tennis Books and More


Australian Open 2017 is less than a month old in the tennis history books.  Tennis, as a sport, is not built for sensationalism and tennis players are mostly private people.  Almost all the news were built around the post-match interviews, as such, a few days after the Epic final, there was hardly any new stories.   

There is no down month for tennis except December.  February, however, has more of the smaller events which do not feature many top players and there is a void of star power after the ecstatic fairy tale ending of Australian Open 2017.   There are books out there to fill that void and invite us to the memory lane of prior tennis generations.   Jimmy Connors, John McEnroe, Pete Sampras, Andre Agassi, Rafa Nadal, Novak Djokovic and many others had written autobiography or biography.  I have read quite a few of them.  The game of tennis is not just made of stars and legends, there are hundreds of other professional players and without them, the stars do not shine as much.

breaking-backYou don’t need to know much about tennis to like reading “Breaking Back” by James Blake.   James Blake is a retired tennis pro and is two years older than Roger Federer.   He achieved a career high ranking at number 4 after surviving a freak-accident during practice in Rome, the loss of his beloved father, and a potential career-ending illness.  James Blake provides detailed recollections of his professional wins and losses, his relationship with family and friends, his struggles to overcome life challenges.  It is a story of his relationship with life and how he overcome the dark days, and arrive on the other side with a new approach to everything on the court and off.   It is an inspiring read.

“Top Spin”, by Eliot Berry, is a book about college and topspinprofessional tennis in the 90s – those were the years when Pete Sampras was on the rise and Stefan Edberg was fading.  It covers some matches of Pete Sampras and some matches of Stefan Edberg.  Yet, this is not a book about tennis stars, it is a book about those lesser-known and their path towards college or skipping college to be a professional tennis player. The author followed a few up-and-starters (Jonathan Stark, a pro made it to the top 30s at one point; Ania Bleszynski, a Stanford college tennis player).  For those who love stars, there is a chapter covering a conversation with tennis legends in the 60s and 70s (Rod Laver and Ken Rosewall), and there is a chapter devoted to Wimbledon.

“Epic”, by Mattheepicw Cronin, is the riveting account of the McEnroe vs Borg rivalry through the Wimbledon and US Open Finals in 1980.  Many would remember the 18-16 tie breaker in the fourth set of the 1980 Wimbledon final and until 2008, the 1980 Wimbledon final has been considered by many as the greatest Wimbledon final.  The author recollected the two finals with detailed accounting of many points in those engrossing five setters, and in between those sets, covered the personality, the career and the relationship of the two players.  Their rivalry, their friendship, and their contrasting style was unmatched until almost 28 years later as Federer and Nadal played that “heart breaking” five setters in the Wimbledon final in 2008.  “Epic” is a reminder of the many great tennis matches, and that the sport is bigger than any players.

If these books are not enough to satisfy the tennis appetite, there is the Bud Collins’ Modern Encyclopedia of tennis, covering players from 1874 to 1994.  

Leave a comment »

Magical Australian Open 2017

We like fairy tales, only very few believe in them.  We are lucky to witness near miracles. In this Australian Open 2017 men’s final, both miracles and fairy tales seem to happen.   I would not forget about this “against all odds” win of Roger Federer in my life.   

fedrot15I love tennis.  The challenge is thrilling, there is that desire to play better and the happiness, associated with the presence of mind in the playing moments, delivers even at tough moments in life.

I follow men’s tennis and watch reasonable number of full tennis matches.  Watching a full match is very different from catching highlights.  In a full match esp. best of five, there are lots of twists and turns, ups and downs, the break points and serve for the match.  It is like many life events on display in one tennis match. A great match can be so inspiring.  There is often that reverse of fortune, if one player can save many breakpoints, he would break his opponent in the next game.  That is a lesson of hanging tough and before one knows it, the good fortune may show up; or if one does not seize opportunity, it would be lost.

4championsEvery fan has different favorite tennis players.  How much I hope Lendl would have won Wimbledon. He tried so very hard, he skipped French open for 2 years and focused on grass practice, but it was not meant to be, and he ended up as 2-times Wimbledon finalist.  It was a good moment when Murray, his pro·té·gé,  won it twice years after.  That 2002 US open win of Sampras over Agassi was heart warming, though the result did not come as much as a surprise as Sampras beat Agassi in 3 US open finals prior, at that stage, Sampras was no longer in love with the sport.  

No player tops my admiration towards how Federer plays the games and how much he is in love with tennis.  It is unimaginable if a tennis lover would not also love Federer the same.  When he plays well, he is not playing points by points, his play is a flow of different shots, with smooth transition between points, and the spectators are as emotionally vested in the match as the players.  It is so different from his contemporaries who often play the attrition game with strenuous and at times monotone shots.   The 2006 to 2008 Wimbledon final between Federer and Nadal made an unforgettable trilogy, though the ending was a heartbreaker for Federer fans (and me).  It still hurt to  read the book on the match years after.  The 2006 to 2008 relentless pursuit of French Open got us mostly disappointed how he often seemed to play so tight in Roland Garros against 3musketeersNadal.  The 2009 devastating loss of Federer against Nadal in AO final also hurt, in a match that Federer knew he should have won.  That same year, Federer was rewarded with the elusive French Open, followed by a Wimbledon win.  Those reverse of fortune is so telling that there is always something after the toughest setback.  Tennis is greater than any player, but Federer comes that close to equate to tennis.  

Reading through interview transcripts is my way to know the players, rather than through the eyes of the journalists.  There are way more nice guys in tennis, they are not perfect, they are all insanely competitive, most have extremely positive mindset, overall, they are genuine people.  Many ponder this 18 Grand Slam makes perfect exit for Federer.  My guess is that he would play until his body tells him to stop, until then he would continue to enjoy those moments of competition, shot making and simply playing.  He accepts that he would not win (as) much, which makes every win even more special.  And he would be happy as he knows each win makes all the people he care about happier than him.
fedrot18

So many have been written about the AO 2017 final.  Federer got to his elusive 18 majors, he won 4 top-10 players along the way, he did three 5-setters, he had medical time out in two matches, he won a major final against his nemesis Nadal after 10 years, he won it in his very first tournament after a six-month injury break.  Any of these made great storylines.  What is forever heartwarming is that in this tournament, he has played with courage, he has played freely, win or lose he has played his own attacking game, he has shown belief, and above all, he has played with joy.  In that final match, he is connected with everyone he cares about, he is connected to past, present and future tennis.  That is just beautiful.
img_20170203_083751

Wall Street : Thank you Roger.  Thank you Rafa
Time: Roger Federer Defied Age, Expectations and Nerves to Win 18th Grand Slam
New York times: Roger Federer defying age
Time: Federer Q&A after his AO win
CNN: 18 reasons to love Roger Federer
Australian: The poet and the pit bull

Australian Open: the grandest of slam
Australian Open: a miracle of modern sport

ESPN: Hard to remember a more significant slam
BBC: Roger Federer & Rafael Nadal turn back clock
Book : stroke of genius: Federer, Nadal and the Greatest Match ever played
Book: String theory: David Foster Wallace theory on tennis
Roger Federer interview transcript: 29-01-2017
Pele tweet
Jack Nicklaus tweet
Billie Jean King tweet
Federer tweet
And more tweets

2 Comments »